Overview
Dynaway’s distinguishing strength in the industrial manufacturing EAM segment is its native build on Microsoft Dynamics 365 — financial integration, supply chain coordination for spare parts, and project costing all share the Dynamics data model rather than syncing across separate systems. Founded 2002 and based in Aalborg, Denmark, Dynaway competes with FIELDBOSS in the Dynamics-native FSM/EAM space, with Dynaway leaning more heavily toward asset management and preventive maintenance workflows.
When to pick Dynaway
Dynaway is the right pick for manufacturers already standardized on Microsoft Dynamics 365 that need EAM capabilities — particularly hybrid operations that combine in-house plant maintenance with third-party service. For OEM equipment vendors doing pure field service, FIELDBOSS is the closer fit. For non-Dynamics shops, IFS Field Service Management or Infor EAM are alternatives.
Editor's score by market
How Dynaway scores across the industries we cover
Average 7.7/10 across 2 industry-specific evaluations by Chip Alvarez. Higher scores indicate stronger fit for that trade; click through to read the full market roundup.
Integrations
Microsoft Dynamics 365 (native deep integration)Microsoft TeamsMicrosoft Power BISAP systems via integration middlewareIoT platforms and sensorsSupply chain management systemsFinancial accounting systemsCommon manufacturing systems
Best for:Manufacturers on Microsoft Dynamics 365, Hybrid in-house plus third-party service operations
Industries:Industrial Manufacturing,Asset-Heavy Operations
Featured in our guides & reviews
Where Dynaway shows up in our editorial coverage — best-of roundups, head-to-head comparisons, and the guides and articles that mention it.
Pricing and feature data current as of April 30, 2026. Verify with vendor.